More Guidelines for Evaluating Websites:
If you are evaluating websites and need guidelines
with a specific focus, use the annotated list below as a starting point. Click
on a link to go to the guidelines.
10 C’s
for Evaluating Internet Sources:
http://www.uwec.edu/Library/Guides/tencs.html
(University
of Wisconsin – Eau Claire criteria for evaluation developed from 1991 to 1996,
revised 2001)
A
Multicultural Model for Evaluating Educational Web Sites:
http://curry.edschool.virginia.edu/go/multicultural/net/comps/model.html
(These
multicultural evaluation guidelines from 1999 are applicable to any level or
category)
American
Library Association Selection Criteria:
http://www.ala.org/parentspage/greatsites/criteria.html
(1997
criteria for a great website – they used these criteria to identify more than
700 sites)
Cabrillo
College’s Evaluating Internet Sites:
http://libwww.cabrillo.cc.ca.us/html/about/jsworksheet-3.html
http://www.cabrillo.cc.ca.us/~tsmalley/evalintres.html
(brief,
linked evaluation guidelines from 2000, with multiple links to thought-provoking
websites)
Checklist
for Evaluating Web Resources:
http://library.usm.maine.edu/guides/webeval.html
(U. of
Southern Maine Library’s 2000 evaluation checklist with research focus)
Cyber-Guide
Ratings for Content Evaluation:
http://www.cyberbee.com/guides.html
(useful
format for evaluation from K-12 perspective)
Evaluating
Sources:
http://osu.orst.edu/dept/eli/july1996.html
(evaluation
guidelines, updated Feb 2002 from 1996, from English Language Institute at
Oregon State)
Evaluating
Website Content:
http://www.iss.stthomas.edu/evaluate.htm
(University
of St Thomas ISS-Learning Center’s 2000 evaluation guidelines with links to
multiple humorous “examples of the problem” some websites present)
Finding
and Evaluating Adult ESL Resources on the World Wide Web:
http://www.cal.org/ncle/digests/findingQA.htm
(National
Center for ESL Literacy Education ERIC digest from 2000)
How to
Evaluate A Web Page:
http://manta.library.colostate.edu/howto/evalweb.html
(Colorado
State University Library’s evaluation guidelines and checklist from 2002)
Information
Literacy: The Web Is Not An Encyclopedia
http://www.inform.umd.edu/LibInfo/literacy/
(2001
revised from 1996, evaluation guidelines from University of Maryland’s Office
of Information Technology)
Internet
Information Evaluation Form:
http://www.edtech.vt.edu/edtech/kmoliver/webeval/form2.pdf
(2000
adapted from 1998, Likert-scale rating form for websites)
Kathy
Schrock’s Guide for Educators: Critical Evaluation Information
http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/eval.html
(Annotated
list of evaluation guidelines and numerous links to websites for critical
thinking, from 1995-2002)
net.TUTOR
Evaluation of Web Sites:
http://gateway.lib.ohio-state.edu/tutor/les1/index.html
(brief
evaluation guidelines from Ohio State University Libraries, 1997-2001)
Techniques
for Evaluating American Indian Web Sites:
http://www.u.arizona.edu/~ecubbins/webcrit.html
(evaluation
guidelines with anti-bias focus, updated 2000 from 1997)
The Good,
The Bad, and The Ugly:
http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/evalcrit.html
(Detailed
evaluation criteria for websites from New Mexico State University, updated 2002
from 1997, with each criterion linked to sample sites for more in-depth
evaluation)
The
Virtual Chase: Assess The Quality of Information at a Website:
http://www.virtualchase.com/howto/assess_quality.html
(2002
evaluation checklist from a legal research perspective)
Thinking
Critically About WWW Sources:
http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/college/help/critical/index.htm
(updated 2000 from
1995, UCLA evaluation guidelines emphasizing critical thinking)
|